We use cookies and similar technologies on this website ("Cookies"). In order to allow their use to analyze website usage and to enhance functionality, please click on “Accept”. To change the settings and select which specific Cookies we are allowed to use, or to obtain more detailed information, please click on “Details”.




Below, you can activate/deactivate the individual technologies that are used on this website.
Consent to all

These Cookies make a website usable by providing basic functions such as page navigation, language settings, and access to protected areas. As the website is unable to function properly without them, you cannot opt out of this kind of Cookies.


These Cookies help us to improve the functionality and attractiveness of our websites, and your user experience by saving, for example, your settings, and selections as well as filters, and to recognize your device on subsequent visits.


These Cookies allow us, and the service providers (e.g. Google via the Google Analytics service) to collect and analyze information and statistics about your interaction with our website. This helps to optimize our website using the findings obtained.

Replacing Inefficient Equipment with Refurbished Oxidizers Saves Aluminum Wheel Manufacturer Tens of Thousands of Dollars on Energy Annually

In keeping with their green factory efforts, with a focus on reducing fuel consumption, the aluminum division of CMWA approached the Clean Technology Systems division of Dürr Systems Inc. The plant was in the midst of a company-wide initiative to reduce energy at both the aluminum and steel wheel divisions.

CMWA (Central Motor Wheel of America, Inc.) is a TS16949 certified joint venture of Central Motor Wheel of Japan, Ltd. (CMW) and Toyota Tsusho of America (TAI) located on 55.4 acres in Paris, KY. They manufacture steel and aluminum wheels for the automotive industry through two divisions.

Dürr targeted the two paint lines and their respective emission control devices at the aluminum division as a basis for the initial evaluation. Each paint line consists of primer and topcoat booths that recirculate a significant amount of air back to the spray booth while a portion of the air is exhausted to a thermal oxidizer emission control system.  The air that is exhausted to abatement is then replaced via a fresh air source to the spray booths. Each line is also equipped with primer and topcoat ovens that also exhaust to the oxidizers.

One of the paint lines was equipped with a 15,000 Scfm, high efficiency, Dürr Ecopure® RL15, regenerative thermal oxidizer with a thermal energy recovery rating of 95% and an average temperature rise across the unit of 100°F. The other line treated its emissions with a 13,000 Scfm recuperative thermal oxidizer with a thermal energy recovery rating of about 55% and a temperature rise across the unit of about 580° F. Since both oxidizers treated relatively the same air volume and emission concentration, 11,675 Scfm and 21 lbs/hr on average, the recuperative oxidizer became an area of distinct energy saving opportunity.

“The recuperative oxidizer probably offered a lower capital cost and improved the bottom line of the initial paint line package investment. However, the inefficiency of the recuperative oxidizer resulted in long term fuel consumption approaching $500,000/yr based upon today’s natural gas prices” said Karl Walby of the Dürr EES aftermarket sales team.  The comparative fuel consumption costs of the other aluminum line with the Ecopure® RL were closer to $65,000/yr.

Since the capacity utilization of both aluminum paint line oxidizers was upwards of 84%, a new high efficiency RTO would be required to replace the inefficient recuperative unit, recuperative oxidizer exhaust heat could be recovered to supplement the paint process ovens, or a creative alternative solution would be necessary.

After completing a cost benefit analysis of new replacement equipment versus secondary heat recovery, the alternative and most beneficial solution existed at the end of the steel divisions paint line about 200 yards from the aluminum division.  The steel division was equipped with a 40,000 Scfm, high efficiency, Ecopure® RL40 regenerative thermal oxidizer to treat emissions from a similar paint process as the aluminum division. The capacity utilization of the steel line RTO was only about 35%, requiring a nominal 14,000 Scfm of the available 40,000 Scfm. The plant originally expected the utilization of the unit to be greater, but various strategic changes to process formulations, environmental and air balance initiatives have kept the emission control volume of the steel line comparable to the aluminum lines.

The resulting strategy was to optimize the overall emission control scheme for both the aluminum and steel divisions. The project was one of both reconditioning and relocation.  The Ecopure® RL40 from the Steel line would be relocated to treat the combined emissions from both aluminum paint lines and the inefficient recuperative oxidizer would be removed from service while the Ecopure® RL15 would be relocated from the aluminum division to the Steel paint line to be operated at about 93% of its capacity.

The standardized design of the Ecopure® RL was extremely favorable to the project strategy since each system general arrangement closely matched the other. In fact, the existing equipment foundations had both been reinforced to the extent that no changes were required at either site. During the relocation, both units were reconditioned according to Dürr preventative maintenance recommendations. The reconditioning was further simplified and expedited while the units were dismantled for relocation. CMWA handled utility infrastructure changes that were mitigated by the similarity in orientation between the two RTOs.

Most importantly, once the RLs were relocated the recuperative oxidizer was removed from service and the duct work from the corresponding paint line was re-routed a nominal 180° to the newly relocated RL40 along with the first paint line.  Even with the combined emissions from both of the aluminum lines there remains 40% spare capacity in the unit if future sources require controls.

The project was successfully executed from start to finish in a remarkably fast six week schedule from order receipt to completion. During the third week of the project the CMWA process engineer and project leader, Brent Hurley, had the following comments, “I think the project is going exceedingly well. I could not be happier with Dürr’s site supervisors and subcontractors. They know exactly what they are doing and they are able to keep me confident in the success of the project. We have been ahead of schedule virtually the whole time.”

The combined total natural gas consumption savings of the project resulted in 7.25 million Btu’s per hour and a projected $427,000 per year savings based upon current fuel costs and production hours of operation.

The project moved forward quickly, in part, because the return on the project investment was less than twelve months.